Storytlr, la tua vita online

di
Spread the love

Storytlr è un servizio simile a Friendfeed, che offre un approccio diverso per il lifestreaming. Con Storytlr è possibile creare lifestreams più personali per raccontare le vostre storie, o gli eventi a cui avete partecipato. Per esempio, se avete fatto una vacanza all’estero, o semplicemente una gita fuoriporta, su Storytlr potrete costruire una “storia” con le vostre foto, video e tweets.

La novità sta nel fatto che Storytlr offre un servizio di hosting, ma se lo desiderate è anche possibile ospitare Storytlr sul proprio server. Il servizio è ampiamente personalizzabile, con una serie di design già pronti per essere applicati alle pagine, ma si può anche modificare il CSS e sostituirlo con uno fatto da noi. Una gamma di strumenti sono già disponibili, compreso un Lifestream Widget, simile ancora a quello di FriendFeed, anche se non è altrettanto configurabile. In compenso, si possono inserire nuovi contenuti in Storytlr tramite un bookmarklet o via e-mail.

Storytlr è uno strumento flessibile e facile da usare per coloro che vogliono unire in una sola pagina web la capienza del blog, con l’immediatezza del flusso di informazione tipico dello streaming.

Related Posts:

847.828 commenti su “Storytlr, la tua vita online”

  12. Everything published made a ton of sense. But, what about this?
    suppose you typed a catchier title? I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how
    to run your website, but what if you added a headline to
    maybe get a person’s attention? I mean Storytlr, la
    tua vita online | IoChatto is kinda boring. You should look at Yahoo’s home page and watch how they create post titles to grab
    viewers to click. You might try adding a video or a
    pic or two to get readers excited about everything’ve written.
    Just my opinion, it might make your website a little
    livelier.

    Also visit my page :: fuel Truck

    Rispondi

  33. Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
    [url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken зеркало[/url]
    First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”

    For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.

    The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
    https://kra26c.cc
    кракен
    Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.

    And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.

    Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.

    Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
    Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.

    His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”

    Rispondi

  34. I’m really impressed with your writing skills and also with
    the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you
    customize it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality
    writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one nowadays.

    Rispondi

Lascia un commento