Un buon motivo per non iscriversi a Pinterest

di
Spread the love

Tutti usano Pinterest, ma quasi nessuno si è preso la briga di leggere con attenzione i termini di utilizzo del social network. Invece, proprio nel caso di Pinterest, è consigliabile dare un’occhiata approfondita ai Terms of Use prima di aprire un account, perché ci sono alcune cose che non tornano.

Pinterest è un sito che appartiene alla società Cold Brew Labs, dove puoi postare anzi “pinnare” le immagini che trovi in giro per la rete su una o più bacheche virtuali chiamate “boards”, e raggruppare le foto che ti piacciono di più sotto i temi più svariati. Tu per esempio puoi creare una board dedicata interamente alle scarpe, e un’altra con tutte le foto del mio cantante preferito. Ma prima di cominciare è bene che tu sappia che quando ti iscrivi a Pinterest accetti automaticamente di attenerti ai termini di utilizzo del network, che sono piuttosto ambigui.

Nell’insieme di norme che regolano i Terms of Use di Pinterest, elencato come Member Content ho trovato questo:

You acknowledge and agree that you are solely responsible for all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services. Accordingly, you represent and warrant that: (i) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses, consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights in such Member Content, as contemplated under these Terms; and (ii) neither the Member Content nor your posting, uploading, publication, submission or transmittal of the Member Content or Cold Brew Labs’ use of the Member Content (or any portion thereof) on, through or by means of the Site, Application and the Services will infringe, misappropriate or violate a third party’s patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights, or rights of publicity or privacy, or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation.

Per farla breve, il paragrafo dice che quando posti una foto su Pinterest dichiari che sei l’unico e solo proprietario di quell’immagine, o di aver ricevuto espressamente il consenso del proprietario alla pubblicazione, e di conseguenza di non stare violando nessun copyright.

È fondamentale che il copyright sia tuo, perché solo così Pinterest può vendere tutto quello che hai pinnato.

By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.

Se il copyright non è tuo, allora vuol dire che hai infranto i diritti proprietari di terzi, e la responsabilità non è di Pinterest, ma soltanto tua.

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold Cold Brew Labs, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, losses, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable legal and accounting fees, arising out of or in any way connected with (i) your access to or use of the Site, Application, Services or Site Content, (ii) your Member Content, or (iii) your violation of these Terms.

Facciamo un esempio: tu hai pinnato qualcosa che non è tuo, magari proprio la foto del tuo cantante preferito ma scattata da un famoso fotografo. La foto è bella e Pinterest se la rivende. Allora il suddetto fotografo decide di far valere il diritto alla proprietà intellettuale e chiede un indennizzo alla Cold Brew Labs. La società a questo punto se ne lava le mani perché tu hai dichiarato di essere l’unico e solo proprietario della foto. Così alla fine ti ritrovi da solo a pagare i danni e tutte le spese legali.

Ti sembra un’esagerazione? Forse hai già dimenticato cosa è successo con la chiusura di Megaupload.

Via | Knoed

Related Posts:

343.883 commenti su “Un buon motivo per non iscriversi a Pinterest”

  20. Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is at the heart of their reason for entering Parliament in the
    first place hear themselves?

    In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against proposed electoral
    reforms that the major parties look set to
    come together to support.

    The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate,
    caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of
    an arms race, and a $90million limit on what any party can spend at an election – actually
    less than the major parties currently spend.

    The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds
    for donations, thus increasing the transparency of who
    makes political donations in the first place.

    So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes – and the extent to
    which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.

    The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the
    speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need
    to be made.

    At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made –
    but you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later, well after elections are won and
    lost.

    In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result in much greater transparency and far less big money
    being injected into campaigning by the wealthy.

    Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were ‘running scared’ with the policy and warned the reform would ‘not stop the rot’ 

    Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot –
    saying if it serves only the major parties ‘it’s a
    rort, not reform’. Teal independent ACT senator David Pocock (right) said: ‘What seems to be happening is a
    major-party stitch-up’

    Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current
    rules, will need to disclose having done so. And how much they can donate will be capped.

    Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling them a ‘stitch-up’, ‘outrageous’ and ‘a
    rort, not a reform’. 

    They have lost their collective minds after finding
    out that Labor’s proposal just might secure
    the support of the opposition.

    I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before
    even starting to write this column.

    Because I had assumed – incorrectly – that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence of the wealthy
    must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or
    the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort
    to drag the major parties closer to accountability.

    More fool me.

    The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor
    and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.

    It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.

    Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive Palmer

    Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court

    The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations
    rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)

    The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of Simon Holmes
    à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the Teals. 

    And we know the Greens have taken massive donations
    from the wealthy in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.

    Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will curtail dark art of political donations.

    The Labor government isn’t even seeking for these transparency rules to take effect
    immediately, by the way. It won’t be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed to catch the crossbench out.

    They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough time to
    absorb and understand the changes before preparing for them.

    Don’t get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition.
    I imagine the opposition want to go over the laws with a
    fine tooth comb.

    As they should – because it certainly isn’t beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the
    proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable of taking advantage of,
    therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years to come.

    But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a
    deal to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should
    offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what
    is being advocated for.

    They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be
    incorporated in the package.

    To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about being in politics to ‘clean things
    up’.

    Rispondi

  28. The Reasons Behind Why Online Casinos Have Become So Popular

    Internet-based gambling hubs have revolutionized the gambling scene, providing a unique kind of comfort and range that conventional gambling houses fall short of. Over time, millions of players across the globe have embraced the excitement of online gaming because of its anytime, anywhere convenience, captivating elements, and progressively larger game libraries.

    One of the main appeals of online gaming options is the incredible diversity of gaming experiences at your disposal. Whether you are a fan of rolling retro slots, trying out plot-filled visual slot games, or playing smart in classic casino games like Texas Hold’em, online platforms offer numerous possibilities. Several sites additionally feature live gaming streams, allowing you to interact with professional croupiers and co-players, all while experiencing the engaging vibes of a traditional gambling venue right at home.

    If you’re new with the world of digital casinos or hope to discover safe services, why not engage with our lively online hub? It’s a place where players post tips, enabling you to get the most out of your gaming journey. Dive into the connections and start your journey now: https://www.instagram.com/136bet_com/ .

    Beyond variety, online casinos shine availability.

    Rispondi

  33. Hi just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a
    few of the images aren’t loading properly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried
    it in two different browsers and both show the same results.

    Rispondi

  37. Het spel Plinko is een veelgeprezen gokspellen die de afgelopen jaren beschikbaar zijn in de online casinowereld. Het spel zelf, dat vandaan komt van de tv-show ‘The Price Is Right’, heeft zich doorontwikkeld naar de online gokwereld.

    In dit artikel kijken we naar alles wat je moet begrijpen over het Plinko spel, van de beginprincipes van het spel tot hoe je de kans krijgt om echt geld te winnen en de handigste adviezen om te winnen.

    Web: https://awesomestuffs.website/2024/10/14/plinko-spelen-in-nederland-speel-online-bij-top-casinos/

    De casinogame Plinko is een simpel spel met veel spanning kansspel dat zijn oorsprong vindt in de Amerikaanse tv-show The Price Is Right. Het spel bestaat uit een verticaal bord met een aantal uitstekende pinnen waar de vallende bal van bovenaf doorheen doorheen rolt. De bal bounced van de pinnen en komt neer in een van de vakken onderaan, die elk een bepaald bedrag vertegenwoordigen. De winbedrag is afhankelijk van de bal belandt. Dit betekent dat het een spel van geluk is, waarbij spelers niet kunnen voorspellen waar de bal terechtkomt.

    Hoewel de basisstructuur van het spel simpel zijn, maakt de randomheid van het spel het boeiend en spannend. Dit is een van de onderdelen waarom Plinko in de gokwereld zo’n hype heeft veroorzaakt. Het wordt vaak aangeboden als een Plinko online game in verschillende online online casino’s, waar spelers geld kunnen winnen door te gokken door te te proberen op de uitkomst van hun gokballen.

    Wanneer je een Plinko game in een casino speelt, lijkt het spel meestal te lijken op de tv-versie van het spel. De afwijkingen liggen in het feit dat je inzetten kan en het feit dat je met echt geld inzetbaar is. In plaats van voor aandachtspunten zoals in de serie, kun je in een online casino voor echt geld spelen. De vergoedingen worden bepaald door het doel waarin de bal landt wordt berekend.

    Je bepaalt hoeveel je speelt, en gebaseerd op je inzet kunnen de uitbetalingen varieren. De Plinko game online wordt vaak aantrekkelijk gepresenteerd, wat het voor onervaren spelers makkelijker maakt om het spel uit te voeren. Veel online casino’s bieden een Plinko game download optie, zodat je het spel kunt spelen op je tablet, zelfs zonder online te hoeven zijn. Dit verhoogt de vrijheid en maakt het spel toegankelijker.

    Rispondi

Lascia un commento