Un buon motivo per non iscriversi a Pinterest

Spread the love

Tutti usano Pinterest, ma quasi nessuno si è preso la briga di leggere con attenzione i termini di utilizzo del social network. Invece, proprio nel caso di Pinterest, è consigliabile dare un’occhiata approfondita ai Terms of Use prima di aprire un account, perché ci sono alcune cose che non tornano.

Pinterest è un sito che appartiene alla società Cold Brew Labs, dove puoi postare anzi “pinnare” le immagini che trovi in giro per la rete su una o più bacheche virtuali chiamate “boards”, e raggruppare le foto che ti piacciono di più sotto i temi più svariati. Tu per esempio puoi creare una board dedicata interamente alle scarpe, e un’altra con tutte le foto del mio cantante preferito. Ma prima di cominciare è bene che tu sappia che quando ti iscrivi a Pinterest accetti automaticamente di attenerti ai termini di utilizzo del network, che sono piuttosto ambigui.

Nell’insieme di norme che regolano i Terms of Use di Pinterest, elencato come Member Content ho trovato questo:

You acknowledge and agree that you are solely responsible for all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services. Accordingly, you represent and warrant that: (i) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses, consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights in such Member Content, as contemplated under these Terms; and (ii) neither the Member Content nor your posting, uploading, publication, submission or transmittal of the Member Content or Cold Brew Labs’ use of the Member Content (or any portion thereof) on, through or by means of the Site, Application and the Services will infringe, misappropriate or violate a third party’s patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights, or rights of publicity or privacy, or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation.

Per farla breve, il paragrafo dice che quando posti una foto su Pinterest dichiari che sei l’unico e solo proprietario di quell’immagine, o di aver ricevuto espressamente il consenso del proprietario alla pubblicazione, e di conseguenza di non stare violando nessun copyright.

È fondamentale che il copyright sia tuo, perché solo così Pinterest può vendere tutto quello che hai pinnato.

By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.

Se il copyright non è tuo, allora vuol dire che hai infranto i diritti proprietari di terzi, e la responsabilità non è di Pinterest, ma soltanto tua.

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold Cold Brew Labs, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, losses, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable legal and accounting fees, arising out of or in any way connected with (i) your access to or use of the Site, Application, Services or Site Content, (ii) your Member Content, or (iii) your violation of these Terms.

Facciamo un esempio: tu hai pinnato qualcosa che non è tuo, magari proprio la foto del tuo cantante preferito ma scattata da un famoso fotografo. La foto è bella e Pinterest se la rivende. Allora il suddetto fotografo decide di far valere il diritto alla proprietà intellettuale e chiede un indennizzo alla Cold Brew Labs. La società a questo punto se ne lava le mani perché tu hai dichiarato di essere l’unico e solo proprietario della foto. Così alla fine ti ritrovi da solo a pagare i danni e tutte le spese legali.

Ti sembra un’esagerazione? Forse hai già dimenticato cosa è successo con la chiusura di Megaupload.

Via | Knoed

339.478 commenti su “Un buon motivo per non iscriversi a Pinterest”

  1. Denmark’s Victoria Kj?r Theilvig wins Miss Universe 2024
    [url=https://datification.org/biznes/v-chyornyj-spisok-vklyucheny-club-unite-to-live-uniteto-live-change-team-topboom-etihad-rail.html]гей порно молодые[/url]

    Victoria Kj?r Theilvig of Denmark has been crowned Miss Universe 2024, becoming the first Dane to ever win the competition.

    The 21-year-old, a competitive dancer, entrepreneur, and aspiring lawyer, beat more than 120 other contestants to win the annual beauty pageant in Mexico City on Saturday night.

    She was applauded by other contestants on stage as she accepted the tiara from reigning titleholder Sheynnis Palacios of Nicaragua.

    This year’s finale featured a performance by singer Robin Thicke and was hosted by “Saved by the Bell” star Mario Lopez and former Miss Universe Olivia Culpo.

    The glitzy pageant began with contestants being narrowed down to a shortlist of 30, based on the results of Thursday’s preliminary event, which included a flamboyant national costume contest. The semi-finalists then paraded in swimwear, before 12 of them advanced to an evening gown contest.
    When later asked what she would say to those watching, Theilvig urged viewers to “keep fighting … no matter where you come from.”

    “I stand here today because I want a change, I want to make history, and that’s what I’m doing tonight,” she said.

    Chidimma Adetshina of Nigeria finished as first runner-up and Maria Fernanda Beltran of Mexico was named second runner-up. Suchata Chuangsri of Thailand and Ileana Marquez Pedroza of Venezuela followed – with Pedroza, a 28-year-old mother, making history in the top five after the competition removed several restrictions in recent years.

    This year marked the first time in Miss Universe’s 72-year history that women aged over 28 were permitted to enter. More than two dozen of the finalists were older than would have been allowed in previous years, with Malta’s Beatrice Njoya becoming the first and only woman in her 40s to reach the grand finale.

    Rispondi
  2. Thank you a lot for sharing this with all of us you really recognize what you are speaking
    approximately! Bookmarked. Please also discuss with
    my web site =). We will have a link exchange contract between us

    Rispondi
  3. you are actually a just right webmaster. The site loading speed is amazing.
    It sort of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterwork.
    you have performed a great job in this topic!

    Rispondi
  4. Simply wish to say your article is as amazing. The clarity
    in your post is just nice and i could assume you’re an expert
    on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post.

    Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.

    Rispondi
  5. Hello! I understand this is kind of off-topic but I had to ask.
    Does operating a well-established website such as yours require a large
    amount of work? I’m brand new to operating a blog but
    I do write in my journal on a daily basis.
    I’d like to start a blog so I can easily share my own experience and thoughts online.
    Please let me know if you have any recommendations or tips
    for new aspiring bloggers. Thankyou!

    Rispondi
  6. Australian politicians are almost always opting to fly with Qantas on taxpayer-funded trips,
    despite Virgin offering cheaper tickets.

    Federal MPs flew with the national carrier for 80 per cent of work trips last year despite it not always being the cheapest route, according
    to travel data provided to the government.

    While politicians and their staffers are required to book the cheapest
    flight, it also has to be the most efficient, with Qantas
    offering the most routes between major cities.

    MPs are banned from accruing frequent flyer points on taxpayer-funded trips like ordinary Aussies can, but they can can receive lifetime status
    credits, which allows access to airport lounges and
    flight upgrades.

    ‘How else can one explain the extraordinary dominance of Qantas in securing
    bookings by parliamentarians and their staff?’ Myriam Robin wrote in an opinion piece
    for the Australian Financial Review.

    ‘There’s nothing like accruing status credits on someone else’s dime.’

    Transport Minister Catherine King has since committed to a review of flight bookings by government officials
    which will be conducted by the Department of Finance this year, despite there being just two months left of 2024.

    Politicians’ preference for Qantas may also be put down to the
    airline’s exclusive invite-only ‘Chairman’s Lounge’.

    Australian politicians are almost always opting to fly with Qantas on taxpayer-funded trips, despite Virgin offering cheaper
    tickets. (pictured is Anthony Albanese, with former Qantas boss
    Alan Joyce, and fiancee Jodie Haydon)

    Read More

    EXCLUSIVE

    The Flying Kanga-RORT – why you’re footing the bill as airlines wine and
    dine pollies in VIP club

    Daily Mail Australia in August revealed that nearly every single federal politician in the
    country has accepted free membership of the club.

    Qantas and the Albanese government have both denied the airline enjoys
    any disproportionate level of influence over the country’s political classes.

    A Daily Mail Australia audit of the members’ interest registers – in both the House of Representatives and the Senate
    – revealed almost 93 per cent of the nation’s leaders have
    been ‘gifted’ membership to the lavish, all-inclusive lounge.

    The high profile ranks of government giftees include Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as well
    as every member of his 22-person Cabinet, his
    seven-person Outer Ministry and all 12 assistant ministers.

    While most politicians declared their Qantas’ privileges as a ‘gift’, Labor MP Marion Scrymgour listed her membership as
    her ‘Chairman Lounge entitlement’.

    Daily Mail Australia in August revealed that nearly every single
    federal politician in the country has accepted free membership of Qantas’ exclusive Chairman’s Lounge.

    And it’s not just politicians on the take, with more than 60 MPs – including Marles, Chalmers, King, Bill Shorten, Zali Steggall and
    Tanya Plibersek – disclosing their spouses have also been granted
    unfettered, independent access to Qantas’ luxurious members only lounge.

    Often touted as ‘the most exclusive club in the country’,
    membership to the Chairman’s Lounge has long been veiled in secrecy.

    Even the entrances to each of the country’s six opulent VIP clubs – in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide,
    Canberra and Perth airports – are suitably discreet.

    Though, once inside, the designer lounges are immediately more ostentatious, with free à
    la carte fine dining, table service, a decadent selection of
    wines and Champagne and a discreet army of
    dedicated lounge attendants.

    Membership to the club is ‘priceless’ – it cannot be bought for any amount of money nor obtained via any amount of frequent flyers
    points.

    Instead, each member is hand-picked and approved by the company’s chief executive and chairman.

    Qantas

    Rispondi

Lascia un commento