Un buon motivo per non iscriversi a Pinterest

di
Spread the love

Tutti usano Pinterest, ma quasi nessuno si è preso la briga di leggere con attenzione i termini di utilizzo del social network. Invece, proprio nel caso di Pinterest, è consigliabile dare un’occhiata approfondita ai Terms of Use prima di aprire un account, perché ci sono alcune cose che non tornano.

Pinterest è un sito che appartiene alla società Cold Brew Labs, dove puoi postare anzi “pinnare” le immagini che trovi in giro per la rete su una o più bacheche virtuali chiamate “boards”, e raggruppare le foto che ti piacciono di più sotto i temi più svariati. Tu per esempio puoi creare una board dedicata interamente alle scarpe, e un’altra con tutte le foto del mio cantante preferito. Ma prima di cominciare è bene che tu sappia che quando ti iscrivi a Pinterest accetti automaticamente di attenerti ai termini di utilizzo del network, che sono piuttosto ambigui.

Nell’insieme di norme che regolano i Terms of Use di Pinterest, elencato come Member Content ho trovato questo:

You acknowledge and agree that you are solely responsible for all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services. Accordingly, you represent and warrant that: (i) you either are the sole and exclusive owner of all Member Content that you make available through the Site, Application and Services or you have all rights, licenses, consents and releases that are necessary to grant to Cold Brew Labs the rights in such Member Content, as contemplated under these Terms; and (ii) neither the Member Content nor your posting, uploading, publication, submission or transmittal of the Member Content or Cold Brew Labs’ use of the Member Content (or any portion thereof) on, through or by means of the Site, Application and the Services will infringe, misappropriate or violate a third party’s patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, moral rights or other proprietary or intellectual property rights, or rights of publicity or privacy, or result in the violation of any applicable law or regulation.

Per farla breve, il paragrafo dice che quando posti una foto su Pinterest dichiari che sei l’unico e solo proprietario di quell’immagine, o di aver ricevuto espressamente il consenso del proprietario alla pubblicazione, e di conseguenza di non stare violando nessun copyright.

È fondamentale che il copyright sia tuo, perché solo così Pinterest può vendere tutto quello che hai pinnato.

By making available any Member Content through the Site, Application or Services, you hereby grant to Cold Brew Labs a worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free license, with the right to sublicense, to use, copy, adapt, modify, distribute, license, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, stream, broadcast, access, view, and otherwise exploit such Member Content only on, through or by means of the Site, Application or Services.

Se il copyright non è tuo, allora vuol dire che hai infranto i diritti proprietari di terzi, e la responsabilità non è di Pinterest, ma soltanto tua.

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold Cold Brew Labs, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, losses, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable legal and accounting fees, arising out of or in any way connected with (i) your access to or use of the Site, Application, Services or Site Content, (ii) your Member Content, or (iii) your violation of these Terms.

Facciamo un esempio: tu hai pinnato qualcosa che non è tuo, magari proprio la foto del tuo cantante preferito ma scattata da un famoso fotografo. La foto è bella e Pinterest se la rivende. Allora il suddetto fotografo decide di far valere il diritto alla proprietà intellettuale e chiede un indennizzo alla Cold Brew Labs. La società a questo punto se ne lava le mani perché tu hai dichiarato di essere l’unico e solo proprietario della foto. Così alla fine ti ritrovi da solo a pagare i danni e tutte le spese legali.

Ti sembra un’esagerazione? Forse hai già dimenticato cosa è successo con la chiusura di Megaupload.

Via | Knoed

Related Posts:

339.208 commenti su “Un buon motivo per non iscriversi a Pinterest”

  6. Bwer Company is a top supplier of weighbridge truck scales in Iraq, providing a complete range of solutions for accurate vehicle load measurement. Their services cover every aspect of truck scales, from truck scale installation and maintenance to calibration and repair. Bwer Company offers commercial truck scales, industrial truck scales, and axle weighbridge systems, tailored to meet the demands of heavy-duty applications. Bwer Company’s electronic truck scales and digital truck scales incorporate advanced technology, ensuring precise and reliable measurements. Their heavy-duty truck scales are engineered for rugged environments, making them suitable for industries such as logistics, agriculture, and construction. Whether you’re looking for truck scales for sale, rental, or lease, Bwer Company provides flexible options to match your needs, including truck scale parts, accessories, and software for enhanced performance. As trusted truck scale manufacturers, Bwer Company offers certified truck scale calibration services, ensuring compliance with industry standards. Their services include truck scale inspection, certification, and repair services, supporting the long-term reliability of your truck scale systems. With a team of experts, Bwer Company ensures seamless truck scale installation and maintenance, keeping your operations running smoothly. For more information on truck scale prices, installation costs, or to learn about their range of weighbridge truck scales and other products, visit Bwer Company’s website at bwerpipes.com.

    Rispondi

  15. こうやってみると、生涯通して保険料はちょうと全ペット保険の中でも中間〜ちょっと高めに位置しています。各保険の保険料が上がり方も含めて比較しやすいように７０％補償に統一して（70％補償のないプリズムコールは100％（プレミアムオレンジプラン）、ペッツベストは年間限度額50万円、80％補償、年間免責金額2万円、プレミアム特約アリ）で比較しています。部分補償というと、どうしても高額治療になりがちな手術のみ補償する〜というものが多い中、日本ペットは通院のみを補償する、というパターン。 ホームズの冒険』（1892年、初版本）。 こうして暢子の沖縄料理店『ちむどんどん』は開店し、雑誌で紹介された反響もあって開店当初から大盛況となる。

    Rispondi

  16. 第3作で彼女の正体が判明する。久美子のことを当初はバカにしていたが、第4話で後述する中学時代の担任とのトラブルで疑いをかけられ退学させられそうになった時、自分を最後まで信じてくれたことから信頼を置くようになる。敦に政略結婚を勧め、企業経営を引き継ごうとするが、経営不振と裕美子の父の逮捕等が重なった事もあり破綻。亡霊であるため普通の武器では倒すことはできず、鉄格子などもすり抜けることが出来る。
    1927年に出兵していたニカラグアでサンディーノ将軍の率いるゲリラが海兵隊を攻撃したため、1933年にアメリカ軍はニカラグアから撤退し、従来の政策から善隣外交（Good
    Neighbor policy）に外交政策を移行した。

    Rispondi

  21. Halo 3: ODST 2009 first-individual shooter sport
    developed by Bungie. Published by Microsoft Game Studios.
    The fifth installment within the Halo franchise as a aspect game,[1] it
    was launched on the Xbox 360 in September 2009. Players assume the roles
    of United Nations Space Command Marines, generally known as “Orbital Drop Shock Troopers” or ODSTs, during and after the occasions
    of Halo 2. In the sport’s campaign mode, gamers discover the ruined city
    of new Mombasa to find what occurred to their lacking teammates within the midst of an alien invasion. In the “Firefight” multiplayer option, gamers battle more and more tough waves of enemies
    to attain factors and survive as long as potential; Halo 3’s
    multiplayer is contained on a separate disc packaged with ODST.

    Rispondi

  34. ハイエースに接触した運送会社は、前述の「対物免責」という保険に入っていた。 ８月に入り相手方の保険会社に問い合わせたところ、「保険の契約者は対物免責20万円の契約を結んでいる。有限会社などの類）などに限定されていたが、指定管理者制度では、民間企業なども参加できるようになった。 【はじめニュース】製造業Ｍ＆Ａ成功の秘訣。自動車整備業者は、「事故を起こしたのに３か月も免責の支払いを遅らせるというのは、会社としてどうなのか。朝、出勤したら営業車（ハイエース）のスライドドアが凹んでいた。

    Rispondi

  41. しかし新しい政党も短命になった例が多く、政党間の合併や政党の分裂が相次いだ。新市名は「石岡市」、合併方式は新設合併（対等合併）とすることを決定。
    4月14日 – 自己株式を処分し、NTTドコモに譲渡。 と自分じゃない人を言われてめっちゃブルーになった思い出があります。日本生命.命に別状は無かったものの、搬送途中で猿渡に退職願を差し出し黒銀を退職した。 なお、夫妻で「国民の役に立つならば」と臍帯血の提供を申し出ていたことが話題となる。秋篠宮夫妻のオランダ訪問は種々の周年行事のハイライトとなった。和代夫妻の長女として誕生。

    Rispondi

  46. 調査参加者は、1項目の自記式質問票と、19項目の質問で3種類のセクハラ（ジェンダーハラスメント、望まない性的な注目、性的強要）について評価する短縮版Sexual Experiences Questionnaire（SEQ-S）で構成された調査に、インターンシップの最終月（2017・

    Rispondi

  50. Trump’s call for a protest crackdown has been a boon for Chinese propaganda
    Analysis by CNN’s James Griffiths
    Protesters running amok. Innocent citizens under siege. Outside actors engaging in terrorist acts. Police struggling to maintain control and in desperate need of reinforcements.
    [url=https://kra18-at.cc]kraken26[/url]
    That was how Chinese state media portrayed anti-government protests in Hong Kong last year, dismissing calls for greater democracy and an investigation into police brutality by focusing on individual acts of violence and property damage.
    [url=https://kra18-at.cc]kra17.gl[/url]
    Throughout the protests, the US was consistent in its support of people’s right to take to the streets and have their voice heard. Facing widespread unrest and public anger at home in the wake of the death of George Floyd, the reaction from US President Donald Trump appeared markedly different.
    [url=https://kra18-at.cc]kra30.at[/url]
    On Monday, Trump called for the military to be deployed to “dominate” protesters, and demanded states do more to stem “acts of domestic terror.”
    [url=https://kra18-at.cc]kra4.gl[/url]
    The irony has not been lost on Beijing, which on Thursday marks (or rather doesn’t, the date is highly censored) its own military crackdown on anti-government protesters on June 4, 1989.
    [url=https://kra18-at.cc]kra9[/url]
    “Washington’s promise of equality and justice for all in the country has remained hollow at best,” state news agency Xinhua said in a commentary titled “The coming suffocation of the American dream.”

    “Amid the ongoing anti-racism protests in the country, decision-makers in Washington, instead of trying to sooth the pain and anger of the public, have been fanning the flames, calling protesters ‘THUGS,’ and threatening them with ‘the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons,” the commentary said.
    kra5.gl
    https://kra18-at.cc
    China Daily, a state-backed newspaper, noted that “The US, after the killing of Floyd, seems to be on fire, and troops have been mobilized to subdue angry demonstrators.”

    “This is certainly not what the world expects to see in a country that is the world’s sole superpower,” it added. “But that sadly is the reality of the US.”

    This rhetoric isn’t just embarrassing for Washington, it’s also a sign of how the US may find its influence damaged by a perceived hypocrisy over human rights at home and abroad.

    Earlier today, Hong Kong’s leader Carrie Lam pointed to the unrest in the US as evidence of Washington’s “double standards.”

    “They attach great importance to the national security of their country, but look at our national security through tinted spectacles, especially the current situation in Hong Kong,” she added.

    The ability of Washington to influence Beijing’s position on Hong Kong – which is in part founded on fear of outside influence in the city – was already severely limited. The Trump administration’s reaction to protests at home may have hurt its position even further.

    Rispondi

Lascia un commento